Baxter & Baxter, LLP | Portland Oregon Bankruptcy : Happy Holidays from the LexisNexis Bankruptcy Law Center Staff!

{ Tag Archives } lexis

Happy Holidays from the LexisNexis Bankruptcy Law Center Staff!

Nothing Says Seasons Greetings, like LexisNexis’ Collier Bankruptcy Publications! For a limited time only, you can save 25% on any order over $500 on the LexisNexis Store. Click here for details. Would you believe the Collier Pamphlet

Also tagged a-limited-time, bankruptcy law center, believe-the-collier, collier, collier-bankruptcy, here-for, lexisnexis, limited-time, nexis-store-, nothing-says, publications, seasons, store-, you-believe

2009 12 24 Baxter & Baxter, LLP Uncategorized Comments (0)

In re R. Ring Enterprises, Inc., 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 685 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2009)

NOTE: The links below may be accessed by lexis.com subscribers. Non-subscribers may obtain research packages by the day, week, or month at lexisONE In this LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis, Deborah J. Piazza examines In re R. Ring Enterprises, Inc. , 2009 Bankr. LEX Go here to see the original: In re …

Also tagged analysis, bankr-, deborah, enterprises, issues-analysis, lexisnexis, links-below, may-obtain, month-at-lexisone, nexis-emerging, note, research-packages, see-the, the-day-

2009 10 16 admin Uncategorized Comments (0)

Tax-Stamp Exemption under 11 U.S.C. 1146(a): A Waiting Game in light of Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5025…

In Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc

Also tagged chapter, div-align, exemption-does, held-7-2, not-apply, piccadilly-cafeterias, supreme-court, transfer-tax

2008 06 20 Baxter & Baxter, LLP Uncategorized Comments (0)

Award Nondischargeable

PHILADELPHIA — A panel of the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 6 ruled that a state court award in a divorce proceeding was nondischargeable because the debtor’s wife required the amount of the award for maintenance and support under 11 U.S. Section 523 ( Kirston J.

Also tagged a-divorce-proceeding, a-state-court, amount, appeals, because-the-debtor, chapter, required-the-amount, state-court, the-award, third

2008 06 19 Baxter & Baxter, LLP Uncategorized Comments (0)

New York and Delaware Still Top Venues for Big Bankruptcy Cases

This recent news article has been making the rounds of the LexisNexis bankruptcy editorial staff: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/7534195 � It highlights the continuing popularity of courts in New York City and Delaware as attractive venues in the latest wave of U.S. corporate bankruptcies. Yes, its not exactly earthshattering new news, dear reader

Also tagged article-has, bankruptcy-editorial, been-making, delaware-as-attractive, making-the-rounds, new-news, recent, rounds

2008 05 27 Baxter & Baxter, LLP Uncategorized Comments (0)

LexisNexis Goes Hollywood at 2008 NACBA Convention, May 15-18!

Hi, TopForm guru Ronke Majekedunmi and I will be representing LexisNexis editorial and forms content teams at the 16th Annual Convention at the Renaissance Hollywood Hotel in sunny Hollywood, California. We will be manning the booth with our seasoned sales staff from May 15-18.

Also tagged attending-the, california, convention, forms-content, hollywood-, hollywood-hotel, our-seasoned, our-spectacular, public-records, renaissance, sales-staff, spectacular, teams-at-the

2008 05 16 Baxter & Baxter, LLP Uncategorized Comments (0)

8th Circuit Says Plan Not Feasible

ST. LOUIS — An Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on April 2 affirmed a lower court’s decision that a bankruptcy court did not err in failing to confirm a debtor couple’s bankruptcy plan because it was “not feasible” ( Darwin Gene Rice, et al

Also tagged a-debtor-couple, a-lower-court, april, bankruptcy-court, bankruptcy-plan-, darwin-gene, debtor-couple, did-not, eighth, eighth-circuit, louis, lower-court, not-feasible, panel-on-april

2008 04 17 Baxter & Baxter, LLP Uncategorized Comments (0)

Convert Or Be Dismissed

TOPEKA, Kan. — A Kansas bankruptcy judge on April 4 ruled that a debtor’s student loan obligations did not meet the criteria for special circumstances under 11 U.S. Code Section 707(b)(1) and said the case would be dismissed if the debtor failed to convert it to Chapter 13 ( In Re:�Christine Ann Champagne , No

Also tagged a-for-special, and-said, case, did-not, kansas, meet-the, section, student-loan